30% of the composite
Cognitive & Learning Agility
Speed of unlearning, adaptive problem-solving and the ability of the workforce to re-skill ahead of the operating model.
Can our people learn faster than our markets change?
Transformation Intelligence Index
The TII scorecard
One weighted composite, four pillar scores, and the exposure signals a Board needs before approving the next transformation tranche.
Illustrative reference profile — not a client result
50.0
TII composite / 100
Emerging
Pockets of readiness exist but do not yet hold under load. Targeted sprints are required to protect delivery dates.
Moderate confidence · 100% item coverage
- Responses show very low variation, which can indicate undifferentiated rating.
Cognitive & Learning Agilityweight 30%
60.0
6 of 6 items rated · contribution 18.0 index points
Human–AI Collaboration Maturityweight 25%
40.0High exposure
6 of 6 items rated · contribution 10.0 index points · 30.0 points below re-measurement target
Ethical & Cultural Resilienceweight 20%
60.0
6 of 6 items rated · contribution 12.0 index points
Execution Velocityweight 25%
40.0High exposure
6 of 6 items rated · contribution 10.0 index points · 30.0 points below re-measurement target
Strongest pillar
Cognitive agility
60.0 / 100
Pillar spread
20.0 pts
Imbalance between the strongest and weakest pillar.
Intent-to-execution gap
-13.3 pts
Execution lags the capacity the organisation believes it has.
How the composite is built
Four pillars, weighted by transformation risk
Each pillar is scored from six evidence statements, including a reverse-worded control item. Weights are fixed, so two organisations are always compared on the same basis.
25% of the composite
Human–AI Collaboration Maturity
Readiness to adopt, govern and orchestrate AI-enabled workflows across roles without stalling accountability.
Are our roles designed for AI-augmented work, or around it?
20% of the composite
Ethical & Cultural Resilience
Psychological safety, ethical escalation and cultural cohesion when transformation pressure is highest.
Do people raise risk early, or protect themselves?
25% of the composite
Execution Velocity
Evidence that capability converts into decisions, operating rhythms and measurable delivery rather than intent.
Does decided work actually land, on cadence?
Reading the score
Maturity bands and the intervention line
Any pillar scoring below 60 crosses the intervention line and generates sprints in the 90-Day Transformation Accelerator, prioritised by severity and pillar weight.
| Band | Range | Board readout |
|---|---|---|
| Fragile | 0–45 | Transformation spend is materially exposed to adoption failure. Intervention should precede further investment tranches. |
| Emerging | 45–60 | Pockets of readiness exist but do not yet hold under load. Targeted sprints are required to protect delivery dates. |
| Capable | 60–75 | The enterprise can absorb planned change. Focus shifts to closing the weakest pillar before scaling scope. |
| Adaptive | 75–100 | Readiness is institutionalised. Governance attention moves from remediation to compounding advantage. |
Board & risk oversight
Take the scorecard into an advisory session.
We review the pillar evidence with your executive team and convert the exposure into a governed intervention.